Вон из профессии, американский вариант
Jun. 22nd, 2016 07:34 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
rezoner(Копирую из фейсбука)
А крику-то было, о тупых консерваторах...
"Erratum to “Correlation not Causation:The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1), 34–51 Brad Verhulsta, Lindon Eavesa & Peter K. Hatemiba. Virginia Commonwealth University, Pennsylvania State University
The authors regret that there is an error in the published version of “Correlation not Causation: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1), 34–51. The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed. Thus, where we indicated that higher scores in Table 1 (page 40) reflect a more conservative response, they actually reflect a more liberal response. Specifically, in the original manuscript, the descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative. "
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12216/epdf
Вкратце: авторы опубликовали статью, где утверждали, что консерваторы более склонны к психотизму и авторитарному мышлению, чем либералы.
Поправка говорит, что они перепутали знак, и все наоборот - либералы более склонны.
Но кто же будет эти поправки разыскивать? Слово сказано и разлетелось.
А крику-то было, о тупых консерваторах...
"Erratum to “Correlation not Causation:The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1), 34–51 Brad Verhulsta, Lindon Eavesa & Peter K. Hatemiba. Virginia Commonwealth University, Pennsylvania State University
The authors regret that there is an error in the published version of “Correlation not Causation: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1), 34–51. The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed. Thus, where we indicated that higher scores in Table 1 (page 40) reflect a more conservative response, they actually reflect a more liberal response. Specifically, in the original manuscript, the descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative. "
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12216/epdf
Вкратце: авторы опубликовали статью, где утверждали, что консерваторы более склонны к психотизму и авторитарному мышлению, чем либералы.
Поправка говорит, что они перепутали знак, и все наоборот - либералы более склонны.
Но кто же будет эти поправки разыскивать? Слово сказано и разлетелось.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2016-06-23 03:34 am (UTC)http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/tea-party-science-98488.html - Eureka! Tea partiers know science , 2013.10
- study on the relationship between science literacy and political ideology surprised the Yale professor Dan Kahan behind it:
Tea party members know more science than non-tea partiers.
( on average, people who leaned liberal were more science literate than those who leaned conservative )
"
Kahan wrote that not only did the findings surprise him, they embarrassed him. http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2013/10/15/some-data-on-education-religiosity-ideology-and-science-comp.html
“As I pushed the button to run the analysis on my computer, I fully expected I’d be shown a modest negative correlation between identifying with the Tea Party and science comprehension,”
“But then again, I don’t know a single person who identifies with the tea party, All my impressions come from watching cable tv — & I don’t watch Fox News very often — and reading the ‘paper’ (New York Times daily, plus a variety of politics-focused Internet sites like Huffington Post and POLITICO).
"
no subject
Date: 2016-06-23 04:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-06-23 01:24 pm (UTC)Рекомендую почитывать нелевые сайты. Для "быть в курсе базаров" очень хорош http://reason.com/blog/ – они с удовольствием песочат и левых, и правых...